Thursday, November 29, 2012

Film Review #21

                I received my first taste of the Savannah Film Festival when I watched City of Ghosts. The 2002 drama was written and directed by Matt Dillon who also stars in the film. Other well-known actors include James Caan, Stellan Skarsgård, Natascha McElhone, and Gérard Depardieu. I have mixed feelings about this film. The acting is on par but the promising plot suffers from being overly long. The movie clocks in at 116 minutes. 16 of those minutes could have been chopped off if the film didn't irrelevantly focus on random characters. I tried my best to practice cultural relativism but the music is dissonant at times. I’ll get to all of this in good time. For now, let’s get to the plot!

                City of Ghosts focuses on a conman named Jimmy (Dillon) who is working in New York City. After being questioned by the FBI about being involved in a Ponzi scheme Jimmy heads to Thailand to find his mentor Marvin (Caan), who just so happened to flee the country before questions started getting raised. Through a series of connections he finds himself traveling to Cambodia to track down Marvin. When Jimmy finally arrives there he enters a world of poverty, uncertainty, and danger. The only person he can trust is a loyal cyclo driver named Sok (Kem Sereyvuth). A game of cat and mouse evolves between Jimmy and Marvin that keeps the former guessing. Along the way, shady characters pop up making the audience ponder whether Jimmy will meet death or barely escape with his life.


                Dillon is the focal point of the film and quite convincing as a confused criminal searching for his thieving partner in crime. When Caan does finally appear on the silver screen he is perfect as shadowy Marvin, a thief who knows much more than he will ever let on. If you give some people an inch they will take a mile. Caan’s character will take two miles! Stellan Skarsgård and Kem Sereyvuth deserve praise for both of their roles. They were strong supporting actors that helped us kind of-sort of sympathize with conman Jimmy. Gérard Depardieu is hilarious as a fuming Frenchman who only wants to be left alone to run his hotel. Natascha McElhone is a great actress but the romance between Dillon’s character and hers is rather flat- similar to the end of a summer tryst.  Adding this angle was close to pointless. Overall, my expectations were fulfilled. As I mentioned before, the script’s plot suffers more than the performances.

So.... What's the importance of our romance again?
                The music in this film was dissonant and at times overwhelming. There was no harmony. I don’t know who wrote the score but it seemed like all the music was similar and there was never a moment where the music was calming or pleasant. I’m sure on some level, the music did help layer this story but from my perspective it was very difficult. I can only remember being satisfied with the ending soundtrack. The shots in this film were pretty basic. A series of close-ups, wide shots, 2 shots, and various other viewpoints were taken. The director of photography certainly deserves praise for the aesthetic of the film. Cambodia was put on display in a beautiful yet humanizing fashion.

                I won’t lie to my audience. I’m not going to rave about this film. It’s not horrible… but it’s not great. It’s just somewhere in between. I suppose I would encourage people to see this film if they’d enjoy seeing what it’s like to shoot “on location.” In this sense, City of Ghosts has the same appeal as Slum Dog Millionaire or The Kite Runner. Just less complex and with a much poorer storyline. In the end, Dillon’s film is promising but never lives up to anything.

6 out of 10

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Film Review #20

Never compromise. Not even in the face of Armageddon.
                After reading the graphic novel Watchmen a few years ago I finally sat down and watched the film adaptation. Zach Snyder directs a huge cast that includes Jackie Earle Haley, Patrick Wilson, Malin Akerman, Billy Crudup, Matthew Goode, and Jeffery Dean Morgan. Visually, this film is a masterpiece to watch. The special effects are absolutely flawless. The characters are incredibly memorable and display a great amount of depth. Simply put, Watchmen is dark and ever-engrossing.

                The plot of the film is riveting. The year is 1985 and masked crime fighting has been banned from the United States. Richard Nixon is president and the Cold War is looming over America like never before. The threat of nuclear war between the U.S. and the Soviet Union is rising. The only thing halting an attack is the all-powerful Dr. Manhattan; the only real superhero in the world whose powers are godlike. Outside of these events, the vigilante Rorschach is investigating the deaths of former masked crime fighters that belonged to the group the Watchmen. As the murder mystery evolves Rorschach inevitably encounters his former masked colleagues. Together the masked crime fighters quickly find out that the murders are connected to a plot that is bigger than all of them. The fate of the world will hang in the balance.

                Watchmen is packed with key roles. I will do my best to keep this segment short. Jackie Earle Haley plays the masked vigilante Rorschach. In my opinion, Haley’s performance is the highlight of the film. He perfectly conveys what Rorschach is; a hunted man, who is uncompromising, scarred, dedicated, and above all sincere. Patrick Wilson is perfect as Night Owl. The audience firmly believes that his character is weary, insecure, and conflicted with the state of the world. Billy Crudup should be applauded for his role as Dr. Manhattan. Crudup does a wonderful job of playing a character that is unable to empathize with the human race and larger than life; Dr. Manhattan is the only true superhero of the bunch and his powers are all-encompassing.  Malin Akerman is vital to the entire film because she is Dr. Manhattan’s significant other Silk Spectre. She is convincing as a girlfriend who is fed up with Dr. Manhattan’s inability to no longer indentify with the human race… or with her for that matter. And last but certainly not least is Matthew Goode as Adrian Veidt. Goode plays Veidt to a tee. He is the perfect blend of sophistication, attractiveness, and suspicion.  My expectations were more than fulfilled by every actor.

Snyder directs an ensemble cast
Narration is performed by Jackie Earle Haley throughout Watchmen. He provides the background for so much that is happening and is essential. I can’t imagine a better way to sum up what is occurring. Hayley’s voice enhances the dark tone of the film tenfold. Special effects, costume, and make-up are integral to this film. Without these three things this film would not be possible. Period! The music of the film is amazing and perfectly placed. 70s and 80s popular music is prevalent in the film and provides a great touch for enhancing the themes of the film. The film’s intro is a prime example.



If I could only give my audience one reason for going to see this movie I would say, “Go because this is a great movie. You will be left in awe at times.” Watchmen is not your run of the mill PG-13 comic book movie. It’s a dark and gritty R-rated tale of what could happen when everything goes wrong. The themes brought up are endless. Murder, war, love, sex, conspiracy, insecurity, friendship, and so much more are highlighted. Not to mention, visually the film is a true work of art.

8.5 out of 10

Film Review #19

                I’ll be honest with you guys: Will Ferrell is hit or miss with me. I loved him as Ron Burgundy in Anchor Man. I thought he was hilarious as Jackie Moon in Semi-Pro. Flicks like Land of the Lost, Bewitched, and Casa de Mi Padre haven’t done him any favors however. A few days ago I decided to roll the dice and watch Mr. Ferrell put his comedic skills to use in The Campaign. Jay Roach directs a well-known cast that includes Ferrell, Zach Galifianakis, Jason Sudeikis, Katherine LaNasa, Dylan McDermott, John Lithgow, and Dan Aykroyd. After viewing this comedy I have to admit it’s a winner.


                The plot of the film is humorous and perfect to see if you’re sick of watching those negative presidential campaign ads. Congressman Cam Brady (Ferrell) is running unopposed in his district for the fifth consecutive time.  His bid for a fifth appointment appears to be in the bag until his philandering ways are spotlighted. After damaging his image irrevocably, the wealthy Motch brothers (Lithgow & Aykroyd) decide it is time for the 14th District of North Carolina to have a new representative. Naïve Marty Huggins (Galifianakis) is chosen. In the end, only one man can be declared the winner.  Fully realizing this, Huggins and Brady play a hilarious game of one-upmanship.

                Will Ferrell is perfect as Cam Brady- an unethical, hypersexual, alcohol-fueled politician. His star shines brightest in the film. Galifianakis’ role is memorable too. He is believable as a gullible family man who just wants to clean up the town. However, his “goody two shoes” demeanor borders annoyance sometimes; not to mention the actor’s dialect. Sudeikis and McDermott deserve praise for their roles as opposing campaign managers. Both men are convincing. In order for his candidate to win McDermott appears sociopathic at times! Lithgow and Aykroyd are absolutely diabolical. You will really believe that these two characters will sink to any depth just to make a quick buck. The entire cast filled my expectations. Together, they pack a powerful comedic punch!

The Diabolical Motch Brothers
                A limited amount of special effects were used in The Campaign. How else are we going to allow Ferrell to punch a baby and a dog? More than anything the film relies on offensive and often crude humor. With that said, a variety of camera angles are shown that manage to convey the right tones at the right time. Music is used in a similar way. With that said, all of these techniques combined to enhance themes of ignorant bliss, double-crossing, two-timing, cold calculating, and outrageous antics.
Fun For Everyone To See

                If I can only give my audience one reason to go see this film I would say go because you will be in stitches. The Campaign offers more than a few simple laughs. Seeing Ferrell and Galifianakis face off is a guilty pleasure. You will wish you could view each man’s shenanigans in person. As I mentioned before, The Campaign is a grand reprieve from the mudslinging that is currently going on. Why not slip out of reality for a little bit and have a laugh? It worked for me.

7.5 out of 10

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Film Review #18


           After hearing about the success of Magic Mike I had to see what the fuss was about. I have to admit Magic Mike is indeed magic. I’m not surprised that this $7 million dollar film grossed over $150 million at the box office. The acting is solid, the story progresses smoothly, and you’re constantly becoming more and more engrossed. Towards the end of the film I was dying to know what was going to happen to the main characters. Steven Soderbergh directs a talented cast that includes Channing Tatum, Alex Pettyfer, Matthew McConaughey, Cody Horn, Matt Bomer, Olivia Munn, and Joe Manganiello.

          The film focuses on the entrepreneurial Michael Lane (Tatum). At age 30, Michael has dreams of owning his own business and leaving behind his numerous jobs. Until that happens, Mike has no choice but to keep on trucking. One of his jobs includes being a male stripper at the Tampa club Xquisite. When the sun goes down and the stage lights come on he becomes “Magic Mike.” Through pure happenstance Mike meets and befriends 19-year old Adam (Pettyfer). The two quickly become close as Mike introduces Adam to the world of stripping. Adam reaches success quickly with the help of Mike and the rest of the Xquisite dancers. As the film evolves the audience is given an inside glimpse to the good and bad of prosperity. Regardless of the occupation context the character’s problems and insecurities are incredibly relatable.


          Channing Tatum character is engrossing. You are really able to feel Mike’s struggle. He is trying his best to start a new path but all the odds seem to be against him. Alex Pettyfer portrays Adam’s reckless youth perfectly. It’s very fun to see Adam change from an insecure boy to a desirable sexpot.  His lessons in overindulgence are interestingly shown as well. Matthew McConaughey may deserve the most praise in Magic Mike. He is particularly convincing as the eccentric Dallas, the owner of Xquisite and Mike’s boss. In thinking back to the film, I have to say, his lines are quite memorable. The rest of supporting cast deserves praise too. I didn’t feel like anyone was miscast.

One of the best scenes in the film
          A timeline of sorts was used in Magic Mike to help the audience understand that the events of the film took place in a mere 3 months. Countless close-ups and medium shots were used to bring to light and define the actors’ physiques. A series of two-shots and close-ups was also used to create a more inviting and warm tone for the dramatic moments of the film. Music is a big part of the film. Countless songs from American pop culture can be heard in the film. I thought the music was appropriate because it was able to convey the raunchiness that often occurred.

          Unquestionably, I would suggest Magic Mike to all of my readers. My decisive factor for doing so is simple. You are going to be enthralled by the depth of the characters as the story unfolds. Soderbergh did an amazing job with this script. All I have to say is, if there is a sequel I will definitely be in line to watch.

8.5 out of 10

Film Review #17

Are you a patriot or a vampire?

          With great apprehension I sat down to watch Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Slayer. I wasn’t quite sure how I felt about the 16th President of the United States hunting down vampires. Much to my chagrin I was slowly drawn in by the film’s charm. Timur Bekmambetov is the director. His most notable film for American audiences is probably Wanted. The cast is a group of talented but relatively unknown actors. Benjamin Walker stars as Abraham Lincoln. His supporting cast includes Dominic Cooper, Mary Elizabeth Winstead, Anthony Mackie, Jimmi Simpson, Rufus Sewell, and Marton Csokas.

          The movie is a fictional account of the life of Abraham Lincoln (Walker). As a boy his mother is killed by a vampire named Jack Barts (Csokas). Abraham grows up knowing who his mother’s killer is and one day decides to strike. Abraham’s attempt to kill Jack is a failure. Young Abraham would be dead if it were not for Henry Sturges (Cooper) seeing potential. Henry inevitably trains Abraham to kill vampires. After a period of slaying countless vampires Lincoln decides that he wants a real life with personal attachment. He retires from assassinating vampires and his life progresses. It would seem that Lincoln’s life as a vampire slayer was over. Not quite! While serving as President of the U.S. during the Civil War, Abraham’s past life comes back to revisit him. Facing the extinction of human America President Lincoln decides to pick up his axe and slay once more.

          I thought Benjamin Walker did a great job of playing Abraham Lincoln. During the beginning I felt his character was rather ordinary but I suppose that was the point. After all, the actual Abraham Lincoln struggled with defeat and failure for quite some time. I’ve failed at various things in my youth and have been left questioning myself. Dominic Cooper is charismatic as Henry Sturges, Lincoln’s mentor and middleman. You really feel his presence when he is on screen. Marton Csokas is utterly convincing as a plantation owner and murderous vampire.  Rufus Sewell is an integral part of the film as the story unfolds and Lincoln ages into his fifties. Sewell is perfect for playing the mastermind vampire who is behind the Confederate’s flawless victories. Anthony Mackie and Jimmi Simpson deserve praise for their roles as well. Overall, the cast is an extremely talented one and my expectations were fulfilled.

Walker & Cooper
          With a title like Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Slayer you can imagine that special effects are essential. Thanks to Tim Burton producing the film the vampires as well as the combat choreography were very well done. I really enjoyed seeing Lincoln swing his ax. The fact that this film is set in the 1800s required skilled set design. These ingredients all combined to make the key scenes in the film very believable. I never felt like I was watching something cheap or too over-the-top. The music used in the film is fantastic. It sets the mood perfectly. The score matches up great with Lincoln’s narration in the film.

          I would recommend this film to my readers because it’s well balanced. The film does not try to be something that it is not. The director carefully balanced horror, drama, and fantasy into something cohesive. Add to this an exceptional cast from the bottom-up and you have yourself an entertaining piece of cinema. As long as you’re not going into this film expecting gold you will probably enjoy it for what it is.

6.5 out of 10

Tuesday, October 16, 2012

Film Review #16

        Today I decided to watch a movie that I have been avoiding for quite some time. I took it upon myself to finally view Fast Five. The film was directed by Justin Lin and grossed more than $600 million dollars worldwide. Vin Diesel and Paul Walker star alongside a huge supporting cast. Some of the names include Jordana Brewster, Joaquim de Almeida, Tyrese Gibson, Chris "Ludacris" Bridges, Matt Schulze, Sung Kang, and Dwayne Johnson. Let me make this clear: I have disliked the majority of the films in this franchise. But… I am willing to see any movie where Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson plays a complete badass. With that said, I’ll do my best to be unbiased.

Sorry Vin. You are nowhere near as tall or badass as Johnson.
The plot of the film is multifaceted. After helping Dominic Toretto (Diesel) break out of prison Mia Toretto (Brewster) and Brian O'Conner (Walker) go “on the lam” with him. Eventually they all arrive in Brazil where they accept a “job” stealing cars to make some fast cash. The job goes wrong but the trio manages to escape- and with one of the stolen cars no less. Eventually they discover a microchip in the car. The chip contains details on Hernan Reyes’ illegal operations. Reyes (de Almeida) is a wealthy but shady businessman who also happens to be a drug trafficker. When he finds out that they have his chip and are aware of the location of $100,000,000 he wants them eliminated. To make things worse the trio have Diplomatic Security Service (DSS) agent Luke Hobbs (Johnson) chasing them. Under duress the trio hatches a plan to steal Reyes' $100 million dollar fortune and evade the resourceful Hobbs. This sets the stage for a bevy of action-packed encounters and a climactic ending!

Vin Diesel and Paul Walker play close friends in the film and their chemistry seems as such. Between the high adrenaline action sequences they share insecurities and hope for a better future. While the dialogue between them is less than stimulating both actors do their best with what the writers gave them. Joaquim de Almeida plays his part to a T. He’s totally convincing in his role as a ruthless drug dealer who wants any threats crushed immediately. Speaking of convincing Dwayne Johnson is as well. He was smart, intimidating, powerful, and above all scene stealing. I thought his performance should be applauded. Although, I don’t see Vin Diesel beating him up in a fight… sorry I had to add that last part. My expectations were definitely met for this film and the actors’ portrayals.

The genre of this film really has an effect on the film techniques used. Special effects and stunts are a necessity for Fast Five. The action sequences are first rate; they’re certainly on par with filmmakers like Jerry Bruckheimer and Michael Bay. It’s just a pity they couldn’t use their big budget to give more depth to the actors. Establishing shots are a big part of this film. Rio de Janeiro is a jewel and many times we are treated to breathtaking aerial views. The music is modern, lively, and speaks to an international audience. The song “Danza Kuduro” by Don Omar & Lucenzo is a great example. It sums up what Fast Five is… a fast-paced carnival selling sexuality, violence, and commercialism. With that said, the music is well placed and very appropriate.


            My decisive factor for going to see Fast Five is simple. It’s a badass movie with one badass hombre named Dwayne Johnson. I thought he was the heart and soul of the film. He adds depth to a script that suffers from cheesy one-liners and a world where feminism never existed. People who are going to see this movie are not expecting Shakespeare. It’s like a Die Hard film on some levels. Audiences don’t always want caviar. Sometimes a deliciously greasy cheeseburger is satisfying and what we want. This is that cheeseburger.

8 out of 10

Film Review #15

Great casting choices for Dark Shadows
         A few days ago I sat back and decided to view Tim Burton’s Dark Shadows. I have to admit I was impressed. I was expecting a disaster similar to Burton’s Charlie & the Chocolate Factory. Thankfully this was not the case. I watched a horror comedy that was smart, hilarious, and above all interesting. The flick stars Johnny Depp, Michelle Pfeiffer, Helena Bonham Carter, Eva Green, and Jackie Earle Hayley.

            In my opinion, the plot of the film is appealing. Barnabas Collins (Depp) is a 200 year old vampire that has been asleep since the 18th Century. When he is released from his chains it is 1972 and much has changed in the fishing port of Collinsport, Maine. Not thinking twice about it Barnabas returns to his old home. He quickly realizes that his descendents are quite dysfunctional. Barnabas and his relatives have been cursed for his actions as a young man. During the 1760s Barnabas seduced and later rejected the family maid of the manor- Angelique Bouchard (Green). Little did he realize, Angelique was a witch and his refusal to love her would cost him everything he cared for. After seeing the Collins name in shambles the recently awakened Barnabas decides that he will rejuvenate their reputation and family business. There is only one little problem however. Angelique has been living in Collinsport for centuries and she has made it her life’s cause to see that the Collins suffer for her pain. This sets the stage for a memorable reunion and a volatile ending.

Depp is a delight
           Depp is too believable in his role as Barnabas Collins- even with that horribly distracting haircut. His manner of speech and line delivery is perfect. Don’t believe me? Perhaps this quote will make you reconsider: “Fifteen, and no husband? You must put those child-bearing hips to good use, lest your womb shrivel up and die.” Eva Green as Angelique is quite convincing too. You really believe that her character is heartbroken and that this drives her to the point of obsession. Michelle Pfeiffer is fun to watch in the film. While her role is not particularly enticing she certainly has presence. Helena Bonham Carter is scene stealing as the alcoholic Dr. Julia Hoffman. She and Depp have some very memorable scenes together. Overall, my expectations were more than fulfilled. I thought this film was going to be painful to endure but it was the complete opposite.

          Like any other Tim Burton film the visuals you see are amazing. His sense of style is so well conveyed in this film. It was fun to see Burton’s gothic yet quirky style on screen. I had no complaints with his chosen aesthetics. The music provided by Danny Elfman is perfect and well placed. The score is creepy, menacing, and extraordinarily sad at times. A whole range of emotions can be felt. I hope the YouTube link that I’m providing below proves this.


           I could list a few different reasons for my readers to go see Dark Shadows. If I can only give one decisive factor to see this film I’d say go for a fun ride. While this film is not going to change your life it is entertaining. If you’re a fan of comedy definitely watch it. The balance scale tips in favor of comedy rather than horror. I hope you enjoy the film as much as I did. That’s all folks!
7 out of 10

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Film Review #14

           Prometheus is a 2012 science fiction film from acclaimed director Ridley Scott. His résumé includes Alien, Gladiator, and American Gangster.  The cast is a mix of famous faces and those that are less known.  Noomi Rapace, Michael Fassbender, Guy Pearce, Idris Elba, Logan Marshall-Green, and Charlize Theron star in the film. Aside from being an opponent of science fiction I have to say I really enjoyed this film. The plot of the film is thought-provoking to say the least. Add that factor with convincing performances and first class special effects and you are in for one hell of a ride.

Scott's latest exploit is a prequel to the Alien franchise
             Prometheus begins with archaeologists Elizabeth Shaw (Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Marshall-Green) uncovering a 35,000 year old painting in a cave. The portrait depicts an image of human beings pointing to the stars. This finding predates all other similar works of art. Suddenly we are whisked away to outer space. Several people (in stasis) are aboard the Prometheus- a spaceship funded by Peter Weyland (Pearce) and watched over by an android named David (Fassbender). The deep space exploration was devised to find alien life forms. The archeologists onboard intend to find and question “the engineers” who are responsible for the creation of mankind. Intentions change as the foreign environment becomes more and more hostile.  Exploration turns into a game of survival!

           Michael Fassbender is captivating as David the android. His character is incredibly intelligent, creepy and detached but still somehow manages to display signs of jealousy. Charlize Theron’s performance should be applauded as well. She plays a very pragmatic, cold and uptight role. Right off the bat you don’t know whether she can be trusted. Rapace is solid as the lead. In my opinion, she represents the attribute of resilience. Her character faces many emotional and physical obstacles that would crush a normal human being. While there are some obvious standouts, the entire cast deserves praise. My expectations were definitely fulfilled.

            Special effects permeate the entire film. The first 5 minutes of Prometheus surely proves my point. Careful consideration had to be taken to costume design, scene set construction, alien aesthetics, and so much more. The alien encounters throughout the movie are effectively convincing. I appreciate that the director did not obtain these effects to simply overcompensate for the script or for poor performances. Everything fit perfectly together like a puzzle set. The music for this film is spot-on. The score is perfectly place so that you feel scared when you are meant to. The composer did a great job of fitting the music with very intense moments: Noomi Rapace’s impromptu surgery scene is a great example.

Case In Point
            I would definitely recommend this movie to my audience. Ridley Scott has created something that is on par with many successful films in the genre. Without giving too much away, fans of the Alien franchise will be please.  Prometheus serves as a smart prequel to those cult classics. My decisive factor for convincing my readers to view this film would be that it is more than just eye candy. The acting and events that occur in this film are memorable. Whether the scene is subtle or adrenaline-filled you will buy into the atmosphere. I never felt bored and the ending leaves you pleading for a sequel.

7 out of 10

Friday, October 5, 2012

Film Review #13

          I have a confession. I hate movies involving science fiction. I don’t know why. Perhaps it was all those nights I had to endure waiting to watch pro-wrestling; every Monday at 8PM I had to sit through an hour of my dad watching Star Trek (FYI: the Captain Picard version). Nonetheless, I decided to watch Men in Black III. The first and most influencing decision for me was that this was a Will Smith film. He is one of my favorite actors. I think Seven Pounds and I Am Legend are two of his best flicks. Reason number two was also pretty simple: Barry Sonnenfeld was returning- the director of MIB and MIB2. Sonnefield directed a star-studded cast that included Will Smith, Tommy Lee Jones and Josh Brolin. With all that said, MIB3 is an entertaining ride that lives up to its predecessors.

                
        The plot of the film is smart. Agent J (Smith) has to go back in time to 1969 to stop Boris the Animal from killing Agent K (Jones). When Agent J finally does travel back in time it becomes obvious that 1969 America is not as welcoming as 2012. Lack of civil rights, technology and an abundance of other predicaments occur. Not to mention, Agent J has to convince a 29-year old Agent K (Brolin) that he’s from the future and trying to save his life. Thankfully, K and J have Griffin to rely on- an alien who occupies 5 dimensions and is able to see the outcome of the future, which can sometimes be based on a few simple gestures. Not to be too confusing, but the film turns into a ‘race against time’ to stop 2012 Boris and 1969 Boris from colluding and killing 1969 Agent K.

           Josh Brolin’s performance as a younger Agent K stands out! He played K remarkably similar to Tommy Lee Jones… but with one difference. We don’t see the old, bitter, jaded version of K. Brolin perfectly depicts a character with a sense of humor, enthusiasm, trust, and nose for curiosity. Brolin is very important to the film because the audience gets to learn why Agent K became so discontented. That discovery is by far one of the best parts of this movie. Jones and Smith are certainly likable and should be applauded for their performances but Brolin stole the spotlight. I was expecting powerhouse performances from Jones and Smith. Brolin was an afterthought for me. With that said, my expectations were exceeded.

           Special effects are an enormous part of this sci-fi comedy. Not to mention MIB3 was made to be presented in 3D. In my opinion the special effects were good. Not groundbreaking…. Not awe-inspiring…. Just good.  Not once could I say the aliens looked fake or something was too over-the-top. Although the jetpack scene was rather amusing; I couldn't help but think about the James Bond movie Thunderball when Sean Connery was 007. The music seemed perfectly placed in my opinion. I had zero complaints. The score is particularly effective when we meet a 6 year old J.

          I would definitely recommend this movie to my readers. MIB3 may be the best film in the entire franchise. You may think differently but at the very least you will acknowledge that MIB3 certainly deserves to compete for the title. My decisive factor for encouraging my audience to see the film is that a good story is told. The writer actually finds a subtle way to connect the films too. I was not expecting a lot from this film and I got much out of it. I hope you will have similar feelings when you view it.

7 out of 10

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Film Review #12

This week I decided to take a walk down memory lane and watch Iron Man. The last time I saw this movie was May 2008, a week after its initial release. After viewing Iron Man for only the second time I have to say it may be Marvel’s crown jewel in terms of comic book films. Director Jon Favreau should be very proud of his work. Iron Man is smart, fun, action-packed, aesthetically pleasing, and loaded with great actors. Robert Downey Jr. is the star of the film but Terrence Howard, Jeff Bridges, Gwyneth Paltrow, and Shaun Toub are integral characters.

The plot of the film is quite interesting. Tony Stark (Downey Jr.) is a highly intelligent, egocentric playboy who inherited a weapons manufacturing company from his father. During a routine weapons demonstration overseas Stark is captured by terrorists. While being held captive he learns lessons in mortality from a fellow prisoner- Yinsen (played endearingly by Toub). Stark manages to escape his death sentence and decides that Stark Industries will no longer manufacture weapons because of the negative effect it has in the world. This causes a rift with his company partner Obadiah Stane (Bridge) whom Stark later finds out has been double-dealing to the United States’ foreign enemies. Shortly after that time Tony designs an Iron Man suit and does battle with a host of newfound enemies including Obadiah.

He's Pissed
Robert Downey Jr. is perfect in his role as Tony Stark. He embodies everything a sophisticated, billionaire playboy is and more. Terrence Howard and Gwyneth Paltrow do not get a lot of screen time but when they do their presence is definitely felt. Jeff Bridges deserves praise for his role as well. His metamorphosis from company pal to murderous, double-crossing cheat is quite convincing. Shaun Toub also deserves applause for his portrayal of Yinsen. He is probably in the film for ten minutes but his portrayal is heartfelt. It had to be. It was a big reason why Tony Stark decides to adopt a new philosophy on life. My expectations for this cast were fulfilled and then some!

Stark & Yinsen
Iron Man uses a variety of film techniques. Special Effects are a big part of the movie. With that said, the director went a long way to ensure this film had top-notch special effects. Examining Stark’s finished Mark III Iron Man suit is all the evidence you need to prove my last statement. Modern rock is a big part of the music. It helps to capture the ‘maverick’ that Tony Stark is [read: badass]. The instrumental musical scores are also very crucial for setting the tone of certain scenes.

If I could only offer one decisive factor for my readers to see this film I would say go because you will love everything about the film. It’s not your average comic book movie. It doesn't suffer from being unrealistic or too cheesy. The actors do a superb job with their depictions of the characters. I promise when you finish the film you will want more. And audiences did. The 2010 sequel to the franchise grossed over $600 million dollars.

9.5 out of 10

Film Review #11




            Countless memories of Arnold Schwarzenegger films caused me to take a gamble on watching the 2011 reboot of Conan the Barbarian. Jason Momoa plays the title character along with a cast that includes Rachel Nichols, Rose McGowan, Stephen Lang, Ron Perlman, and Bob Sapp. Marcus Nispel directed the action-adventure film. In the end, Conan simply lacked substance. I went into this film thinking it was going to be awesome. After all what movie where Morgan Freeman narrates, isn’t? This one apparently!

            This plot is modest. As a boy Conan’s entire village is destroyed by Khalar Zym (Lang) and his band of ruthless killers. Zym is attempting to reunite the pieces of the Mask of Acheron, a powerful relic that can bring back his dead wife and allow him to conquer the known world. Years pass and Conan has turned into a mountain of a man. He has traveled the world slaying beasts, freeing captives, and defying death. Remarkable tales exist about his adventures. Zym along with his daughter Marique (McGowan) need only one more thing to accomplish their dastardly plans: they must find the pure-blood descendant of the sorcerers of Acheron. By happenstance, Conan finds the pure-blood first. Her name is Tamara (Nichols) and by finding her the stage is set for a definitive encounter between Zym and Conan.

            While none of the actors in this film are terrible there are zero defining moments. The script never allows Jason Momoa to display any depth to his character. The child actor playing Conan has a better role in my opinion- Ron Perlman lucks out because that’s the only time he is in the movie. As an adult Conan is only presented as a sword swinging, blood spilling, slave-freeing barbarian who happens to have a predisposition for performing good deeds. Rose McGowan and Stephen Lang have a very incestuous energy on camera but the dialogue is weak. In my opinion, the actors are not left with much to portray because the writers have every character in tunnel vision mode. While I did not have very high expectations coming into the movie, even my low expectations were not met.

            Special effects were important in this film. While they were not fantastic or groundbreaking they were more than acceptable; the film had a budget of $90 million dollars. Unquestionably Conan had some very cool action scenes. But well-choreographed fight scenes mixed with blood and gore can’t save a film that has no dimension for its characters. The music was correctly placed and added to the sense of awe and adventure when it was introduced. The YouTube trailer I've attached should support the opinions expressed in this paragraph.

Hasta La Vista Baby
            Honestly, I would not tell my readers to view Conan the Barbarian. It suffers from poor dialogue, tunnel vision, and a lack of character dimension. In my opinion, the best part of this film is the first 20 minutes. After that, you are whisked away on an adventure that’s not very memorable. To make matters worse. There wasn't even a giant snake in the film! Conan should almost always fight a giant snake…. because that’s cool.

3 out of 10

Film Review #10

This week I decided to check out the biographical drama J. Edgar. The film was directed by Clint Eastwood. It stars one of my favorite on-screen actors- Leonardo DiCaprio. His supporting cast is absolutely outstanding. Mr. DiCaprio shares time with Armie Hammer, Naomi Watts, Josh Lucas, and Judi Dench. Overall, I thought this movie was solid but it does feel ‘drawn out’ at times. The progression of the film is a bit hard to interpret as well.

J. Edgar examines the rise of one of the most powerful men in America during the 20th century. The audience first meets John Edgar Hoover when he is working for Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer at the United States Department of Justice in 1919. From the ‘get-go’ we see that Hoover is motivated, focused, and determined to be the best. This leads to his success of targeting, arresting, and sometimes deporting anti-radical groups. Achievement leads to reward and Hoover was appointed director of the Bureau of Investigation (the FBI’s predecessor). From here Hoover is able to reform police protocol and technology for crime science. He was an advocate for the centralized fingerprint system and forensic laboratories we use today. The film subsequently follows Hoover’s involvement in several high-profile events from 1920 until his death. What is more interesting however is the view into his personal life; in particular his interactions with his mother, trusted secretary, and friendship with Clyde Tolson.

DiCaprio’s portrayal of J. Edgar provokes emotion. As the story progresses you can’t help but dislike Hoover because of his egocentric behavior, lack of sentiment, and illegal methods for obtaining evidence. Armie Hammer is endearing as Clyde Tolson- Hoover’s ‘number-two man’ and rumored lover. Judi Dench’s performance as Hoover’s mother is spot-on. I must confess I despised her character. My opinion was cemented when the audience discovers how Hoover’s mother feels about homosexuals and the possibility of her son being one. With all that said, my expectations were definitely met. The cast is a desirable one and the acting in this film is first-class.

This film pays particular honor to the close-up shot. It allows us to interpret our character’s emotions so vividly. It is especially effective when DiCaprio is on the silver screen. The audience is able to feel so much of Hoover’s seriousness, frustration, egocentricity, and sadness. The music in the film becomes prominent towards the finish line of the film. The end of DiCaprio & Hammer’s fight scene is a great example; the finest instance may be Hoover after the death of his mother.

If I could only offer you one decisive factor to convince you to attend this film, I would say go for the fine acting performances. Each actor gives a truly memorable depiction of their character. While the film does have flaws and it is sometimes hard to grasp the timeline, the events in the film are appealing. Prohibition is not targeted but other happenings like the Lindbergh kidnapping case, the death of JFK, and MLK’s support for civil rights are present. Unless you know the title character’s history front and back J. Edgar will keep you curious I promise that.

7.5 out of 10

Thursday, September 27, 2012

Media Literacy Topic #3 - Part B


Subjective or Objective

PART B: Stereotypes & Genres


·        List as many as you can.
Nerd, athlete, goth, prep, Italian mobster, African-American gangsta, flamboyant homosexual, promiscuous woman, hooker with the heart of gold, corny Caucasian, brainy Asian, blonde ditz, hot-tempered Latin American, greedy Jew, punk rocker, Bohemian drug addict, detached doctor, emo Asian, Middle-Eastern terrorist, drunk Russian….

·        Is there any truth to the stereotypes you listed? If yes, how?
Some of these stereotypes do exist in real life. With that said, to an extent, yes, these stereotypes have truth to them. There are almost 7 billion people on this planet. Stereotypes are simply archetypes that have been spotlighted. Every individual is different but some people do fit into certain categories, profiles, or stereotypes

·        Give an example of one of the stereotypes being used in a movie and why you think it was used.
The Godfather is the first film that popped into my mind. It portrays Italian Americans as organized crime figures in the Mafia. I believe this stereotype was used to highlight the dangerous yet lavish lifestyle of being in the mob. I also believe that America has had a fascination with organized crime since Prohibition began. Boardwalk Empire is a great example of this. Al Capone & Lucky Luciano are prominent characters on the HBO series.

·        Was your reaction to the stereotype positive or negative, and why?
My reaction to the stereotype was of mixed emotions. The Mafia is not a fairytale. It has its roots in Sicily, Italy and arrived on American shores in the early 1900s. New York and New Jersey were their ‘stomping grounds.’ In regards to my reaction, it is negative because some Americans will buy into the idea that this is how the Italian-American family/individual is. In regards to a positive reaction, the stereotype made for great performances and an entertaining movie. Stereotypes are not always helpful but it is the context in which you use the stereotype. A great actor finds a way to portray more than just a stereotype- they have to generate depth to their character so that we remain attached and not bored.

·        List as many film genres or types as you can.
Sci-fi, Fantasy, Action, Adventure, Horror, Gore, Thriller, Drama, Animation, Mystery, Foreign, Documentary, Comedy, Westerns, Crime, Gangster, War, Musicals…

·        Do any of the genres you listed use specific stereotypes? What are they and how are they used?
Crime and Gangster genres tend to use stereotypes. They can target Italian Americans, greedy Jews, Russian mobsters, or British crime syndicates.

90s Action genres are very stereotypical. They usually involve an innocent man who doesn’t want to get involved, eventually does, has to beat the antagonist, save the girl, and flex his muscles at some point.

Westerns are rather stereotypical. These usually involve visions of the Old West, miners, saloons, clever prostitutes, sheriffs, outlaws, Native-Americans, gunslingers, coach wagons, and horses. True Grit is a great modern example but let us not forget about films starring John Wayne and Clint Eastwood.

Horror movies can be stereotypical as well; especially those involving a single killer knocking off victims one by one. It’s been done countless times. Classic examples are Nightmare on Elm Street, Halloween, Child’s Play, and Friday the 13th. More current examples are Scream, The Ring, The Grudge, and Silence of The Lambs.

Media Literacy Topic #3 - Part A

Subjective or Objective?

PART A 

  • List some movies that you really like and some of the things they have in common

The Fighter, The Dark Knight, Clerks, In Bruges, Pirates of the Caribbean, Taken, Kung Fu Panda, Interview with the Vampire, Tropa De Elite, The Departed, My Name Is Khan, The Big Lebowski, Brokeback Mountain, Waiting, Cinderella Man, Gladiator, Diarios de Motocicleta, Jeux d'enfants, A Single Man, Reservoir Dogs

Some of these films have sidesplitting but sometimes raunchy dialogue. I have a knack for fantasy-adventure films. I enjoy a good drama from time to time. I like foreign films quite a bit- especially those that are socially conscious. Health Ledger was my favorite actor and I’m partial to his films. It took all I had not to write Casanova down.

  • Now list some movies that you dislike and some of the things they have in common
Transformers, Hostel, Saw, Fantastic Four, Street Fighter, Captain America (1990 version), Any Horror Movie, Sci-Fi Movie

Many of these films are poorly written, rely on effects too much, or belong in a category I like to call 'horror porn.' I have a personal dislike of Sci-Fi. The most recent Star Trek movie was not bad. It is just hard for me to 'get into' them.

  • List the qualities that would make you see a movie
I enjoy a good gangster-crime flick. In regards to that genre, Safe House was probably the last gratifying film that I viewed. The director can influence my decision. Kevin Smith does not have the greatest track record but I have seen all of his films (even Jersey Girl). I enjoy Christopher Nolan’s films too. The same thing can be said for some actors. Heath Ledger, Russell Crowe, Denzel Washington, Liam Neeson, Ian McShane, Leonardo DiCaprio, Colin Farrell,  and few others. As I type I’m noticing a male-dominated list of names.

  • List the qualities that would make you avoid a movie
Any movie that is highly reliant on special effects always has the potential to be a disaster….Transformers.. cough, cough. This may also explain my utter hatred for 3D movies. I am not saying all movies that use special effects are bad. After all, I listed Pirates of the Caribbean as a favorite. The key word here is potential. But yes, if I am suspicious that this is the case I will avoid such a movie.

  • Pick one medium that you use regularly, such a magazine, television show, or blog. What biases can you find? Are they similar to your biases? If so, how?
Bias is evident on CNN and Fox News
I read CNN news quite a bit. There is no doubt that they are a liberal news provider. And whenever I read something that’s odd I usually go to the Associated Press for clarification- I consider them nuetral. In regards to politics, CNN does cast a more positive light on Democratic politicians. Regardless of the party the majority of legislators are skilled liars in my book. Not to mention, the 2011 Congress was the least active it’s been in 50 years. Now to answer the question: Are CNN’s biases similar to my own. I would answer saying, “Somewhat.” Do I have staunch democratic views? Yes. Do I believe in healthy debate (unlike most liberals and conservatives)? Yes. This “my way or the highway” approach is crazy. One has to respect a difference of opinion.

Film Review #9

Snow White and the Huntsman is a fantasy-adventure film with amazing visuals and a dark undertone. Rupert Sanders directs a cast of notable stars: Kristen Stewart, Charlize Theron, Chris Hemsworth, and Ian McShane. This 2012 adaptation of Snow White is indisputably more serious than the 1937 Disney version. However, it is nowhere close to being as dark as the German tale from the Brothers Grimm. Nevertheless, the film encapsulates a gloomy tone that is ideal for themes like war, murder, jealousy, vanity, betrayal, neglect, and desolation.
The plot of the movie is interesting to say the least. Snow White (Stewart) is born into royalty. Her parents are the king and queen of Tabor. When Snow White’s mother dies, the king is left brokenhearted. That is, until he saves Ravenna (Theron) from the Dark Army. Ravenna was so beautiful that the King married her the next day. Unknowingly, the king married a powerful sorceress. The night they wed she killed him, took over the kingdom, and imprisoned Snow White. When Ravenna took the throne the land and its people became barren. For over a decade everything remained the same. Until Snow White escapes! Ravenna enlists the help of an often inebriated Huntsman named Eric (Hemsworth). When the Huntsman realizes that Snow White is the true heir to the throne he intends to keep her safe. In an effort to capture Snow White, Ravenna allows her venomous brother to run rabid on the land. The stakes are raised and the Huntsman & Snow White have to find the castle of Duke Hammond. Getting there is not easy and the struggle to overthrow Ravenna afterward will be treacherous.

Wait.... Yeah.... She's totally evil guys
As I mentioned before Kristen Stewart plays the lead character Snow White. While I did not find her portrayal bad, I did not find it to be awe-inspiring. It was somewhere in the middle. Her almost melancholy expressions fit the moody tone of the film so I will applaud her for that. Much like when he played Thor, Hemsworth is charming in the film. His monologue after Snow White bites the poison apple is one of the more memorable parts of the film (for me). Charlize Theron is perfect as Ravenna. I bought her portrayal 100%. Honorable mention should go to all of the actors who played the dwarves. Their presence in the film is short but noteworthy. Aside for Stewart’s rather mundane presentation my expectations were more than fulfilled. I thought this movie was going to be terribly cheesy and just plain unpleasant.

In regards to film techniques the film used narration. I thought that made this tale particularly effective and helped to explain the beginning of the film well. The special effects are the most obvious and the most striking thing about the film. Snow White and the Huntsman is as visual appealing as films like Alice in Wonderland and The Fall. Visually this film is a masterpiece but it does have its shortcomings. The song by Florence & the Machine is well placed. I had no issues with the score at all. Each instrumental track used was perfect for themes like battle, sorrow, loss, and eventual victory. The YouTube video below sums up a lot of what I mentioned. Have a peek at Snow White in the Enchanted Forest!


If I had to give you one reason to attend this film I would say go for two reasons [read: I don’t care if that doesn’t make sense]. The cinematography is amazing. The visual effects presented are today’s best. The appearance of the film is an accomplishment itself. Second, I would say go for Theron’s performance. She has amazing presence and her messages of feminism are well conveyed. You fully buy in to her ideas of men.
7 out of 10

Wednesday, September 19, 2012

Media Literacy Topic #2

Film: In Bruges

Describe what happened in the scene you watched; How does the scene make you feel? What techniques did the filmmakers use to make you feel that way?
A bit of background needs to be provided. In the previous scene Ken and Ray were in an art museum that displayed several works of art that depict religious ideas of heaven, hell, purgatory, torture, and punishment. And so our scene begins. From the artwork a lighthearted conversation about ‘living a good life’ starts. Ray and Ken are sitting on a bench in Jan Van Eyckplein Square. There is no action- just 3 minutes of dialogue that contains personal philosophy, humor, and remorse. With that said, the scene makes me feel a variety of emotions. The debate of a 50-year old lollipop man possibly knowing karate is comical. In regards to the humor Martin McDonagh does a wonderful job of expressing dark humor. He makes a conversation about murder outrageously funny. At the same time I feel sorrow for Ray’s character. During a ‘job’ he accidentally killed a little boy. Ray’s guilt and hint at suicide combined with the piano music creates a great tone of melancholy at the end of the scene. In my opinion, the score is the driving force behind the amplified sadness.

How did the pacing of the scene (fast or slow) or the movement of the camera affect your reactions?
The pacing of the scene is slow. As I said before, there is not a lot of movement. Ray and Ken sit on the bench exchanging words. The camera shots are simplistic. The director started with an establishing shot of Jan Van Eyckplein Square. From there Ken & Ray are shot in several frames- medium and close-up 2-shots as well as individual medium & close-up shots. This allows us to fully understand the emotions that the director wants conveyed.

List all the visual qualities such as framing, camera angles, colors, setting, costumes, décor, and lighting.
Camera angles: establishing shot, individual close-up & medium shots, close-up & medium 2-shots. The actors are dressed in tones of black, white, and gray. Shooting in Bruges was perfect for the colors and setting. Bruges is a well-preserved medieval city that creates a very somber tone. The initial establishing shot makes this quite clear. As do the establishing shots throughout the entire film. You will notice rather quickly that exuberant colors are absent in the movie. Red is only seen when blood or punishment are expressed. In regards to lighting, I would imagine that only a key light was needed. The sky is never sunny nor extremely dark. The sky is cloudy and somewhat gloomy. This merely adds to the tone even more.

What was the mood of the scene? How did the colors used in the scene contribute to the mood?
The mood of the scene is twofold. It starts off innocent and playful. It quickly becomes somber as Ray begins to discuss his guilt for the murder of a little boy. The colors of black, white, and gray are perfect. They enhance the scene well.

What did the costumes tell you about the characters?
Ken and Ray are dressed in tones of black, white, & gray. Neither man sports any hint of color. I imagine this was done with a purpose. In my opinion, the costumes convey the black & white attitude both men have. Not to mention the film is a dark comedy. Extravagant colors are absent in the movie. On a side note- the jackets they sport tell us that it is quite cold in Belgium.

How did the music contribute to the mood and what did the music tell you about the characters?
The piano at the end creates a very melancholy mood. The music conveys sadness and Ray’s guilt.

What did you learn about the characters from the dialogue?
I learned that Ray is guilt-ridden and considering suicide because of his accidental wrongdoing. Ken shows us that his work as a hitman has created personal contradictions. While, yes he does murder people for money, he does believe he is a good person overall. He also believes the majority of his victims deserved it. He only feels guilty about one individual he killed; a middle-aged man who tried to attack him with a bottle.

What were the values and opinions expressed in this scene?
Several values & opinions are expressed in the film In Bruges. The Catholicism is mentioned. Both men have thoroughly rejected most of the ideas they were taught as little boys. They believe in trying to do the right thing but they are not bound by any religion. During this particular segment Ken & Ray note the cynical/suspicious attitude that many people can have when you’re offering random help. Ray shows great remorse and guilt for his transgression of accidentally shooting a little boy. Towards the end of the scene Ray hints at suicide because he believes he will never be able to accept his actions. Matters of self-defense are humorous brought up during the ’50-year old Chinese lollipop man’ conversation. Both men agree that homicide is justifiable if, during a fight, your opponent brings out a deadly weapon.

Sunday, September 16, 2012

Film Review #8




           End of Watch is an adrenaline-filled film that examines the rise of two police officers as they protect and serve in South Central Los Angeles. Jake Gyllenhaal and Michael Peña star in the ultra-violent flick. From the previews alone you can’t help but notice the intense violence that occurs. Writer-director David Ayer offers more than ferocity however. Between the action-packed scenes we are exposed to glimpses of the human side of the ‘thin blue line’. The film observes issues of popular culture, camaraderie, family, and the consequences of performing such a perilous job.

The plot of the film is modest. End of Watch focuses on hotshot police officers Brian Taylor (Gyllenhaal) and Mike Zavala (Peña). Both officers work for the Los Angeles Police Department and patrol some of the roughest neighborhoods in South Central L.A. They see more action before lunchtime than most cops do their entire careers! A routine house check prompts the discovery of human trafficking as well as illegal drugs and firearms. The officers receive high praise for the detecting such serious crime. However, the discovery unknowingly makes both men prime targets for a powerful Mexican cartel. The suspense ensues as Taylor and Zavala scratch and claw to stay alive.

Memorable & Authentic Performances
Gyllenhaal and Peña give superb performances- especially when the two are together onscreen. They do a superb job of displaying the camaraderie that develops between partners serving as police officers. Their portrayals show us that at the end of the day, the police are just like you and I. Like everyone else they encounter professional, personal, and psychological issues. The only difference is that they have to protect themselves with a tough exterior when they put on the badge. Natalie Martinez and Anna Kendrick deserve praise for their roles as the significant others of both officers. They helped add so much depth. A police officer doesn’t make decisions that just affect themselves. Their loved ones are affected profoundly as well. Emotionally, I was expecting very little from this film. Needless to say, my expectations were more than fulfilled… and then some!

The director’s use of lighting is significant in this film. The night scenes prominently display darkness and shadows. This created an aura of danger, confusion, and grittiness. The point of view shot was used in one of two ways. The method was used partly to create a sense of intensity. It is noticeable during car chases, brawls, and shootouts. It was also used when certain characters in the movie were recording themselves on camcorders. The music in the film is a mixture of popular rap & rock songs and intense instrumentals- perfect for adding to an already exhilarating scene. The film techniques and the music enhance the setting and themes of the film tenfold.

I would recommend End of Watch for so many reasons! My decisive factor has to be the script. The dialogue between Gyllenhaal and Peña is priceless. That should come as no surprise. The director penned the script for Training Day! I bought into these characters almost immediately. The depth from each one leaves you unbelievably convinced that these men are real- that someone somewhere has had similar experiences. Without a doubt, the writing is the heart and soul of the film. 

8.5 out of 10

Thursday, September 13, 2012

Film Review #7

Y Tu Mamá También

I have a confession. I love foreign films! Jeux d'Enfants, Cidade de Deus, Tropa de Elite, El Laberinto del Fauno, and Das Leben der Anderen are a few of my favorites. Needless to say, I was excited for Y Tu Mamá También. The film was made in 2001 by Mexican director Alfonso Cuarón. I didn’t know what to expect going in but any film with Diego Luna or Gael García Bernal is usually worth a watch. The talented and beautiful Maribel Verdú is a key actor as well.  By the end of this film I was hooked. The actors had range, the story was great, and the ending had a fascinating twist.

The film focuses on the friendship of Julio (García Bernal) and Tenoch (Luna). They are both young men (possibly in their teens) on the verge of adulthood. Their girlfriends have abandoned them to vacation in Italy. Boredom sets in quick. However, a chance encounter with married Luisa (Verdú) changes all of this! Upon meeting Luisa at a wedding the boys drunkenly invite her to a day at the beach – at La Boca del Cielo. Luisa initially turned Julio & Tenoch down but her husband’s recent infidelity has sparked something inside her. She calls them and agrees to go. The boys have but one problem. This beach never existed. Nonetheless, Julio & Tenoch take Luisa on a road trip that leads to fun in the sun, questioning the boundaries of friendship, sexual discovery, heartbreak, betrayal, and so much more.

García Bernal and Luna play their roles convincingly. At first, I thought both actors were typecast as two sex-crazed youths with no depth to their characters. However, the road trip allows the audience to view the opinions and transgressions of Julio & Tenoch.  Maribel Verdú is the star of this film… and for good reason. She is the catalyst for everything. Without a doubt she gives her character Luisa the most depth. She’s everything – heartbroken, angry, experienced, liberal, sexually charged, fun-loving, and a host of other sentiments. I had high expectations coming into this film and the actors definitely fulfilled them.

Narration is the most evident technique used in the film. Throughout the movie an unknown man narrates past and present events in the characters’ lives. I have to admit, all the right words were used when the narrator spoke. It allowed us to add layers to the characters that we would have never been able to. The music for the film is lively and reminiscent of Mexican and American popular culture. This is not uncommon in any movie where a road trip is present. The up close shots were extremely well done and helped to convey the grittiness that sex has sometimes. I have no doubt that this unashamed depiction of sex caused tension within the Motion Picture Association of America.

If I had to give you one decisive factor for viewing Y Tu Mamá También I would say, “Go for the performances of the actors!” I guarantee your initial feelings for the characters will change as the movie progresses. As I mentioned before, much depth is added as we learn about the lives of each character. Maribel Verdú’s role was my personal favorite. This film does not redefine the genre but it does deserve to sit near the top in my opinion. The script is incredibly well written and touches on a variety of topics.

8.5 out of 10