![]() |
This horror film offers more than meets the eye |
The
plot of the film starts off like any run of the mill horror movie would but quickly
transforms into something much better. Five close friends decide to holiday at
a relative’s cabin that’s situated in the isolated woods. Unbeknownst to them,
their every move is being followed and manipulated by a collection of highly
sophisticated ‘technicians’. After an
hour into the film the manipulation backfires big time! Two of the survivors
manage to infiltrate the facility that the technicians are working in. Through
pure happenstance the survivors find out that they are a part of a ‘ritual’
that is meant to placate the Ancient Ones and prevent an armageddon. In the end,
one of the characters has to decide whether to kill himself or wait to die as
the world will surely be destroyed.
Every actor played their role as best they could. The horror genre doesn’t generally allow time for the victims to convey their exterior or interior lives. Usually the murdering psychopath, demon, ghost, etc. gets the majority of the attention. With that said, the zombie family living in the cabin during 1902 had more backstory than the main actors. Moreover, each character was meant to portray a certain archetype: the whore, the athlete, the scholar, the fool, and the virgin. Going into the roles the actors knew they were going to be portraying stereotypes. Were my expectations fulfilled? I’d vote yes.
![]() |
Archetype Central |
Personally, I would recommend this
film to people. My selling point would be that it goes beyond the horror genre.
The film offers more than just fear, screaming, and running. It has comedy, countless
monsters, mild drama, and an interesting plot (at least once the victims leave
the woods). As well, I thought it was very cool how the film ‘tipped its hat’
to a variety of horror movies from the past. The director doesn’t copy any
certain style but he certainly finds a way incorporate countless monsters- and in
quick fashion too!
7.5 out of 10
Your post has me intrigued about watching the movie but I don't like all the blood and guts that you normally see in most horror movies. You mention that this isn't like other horror movies but does it still involve tons of blood and guts to convey its story? Sometimes that's all a horror movie does, it shows a lot of blood and guts, screaming, and sinister music that normally is a copycat of other typical horror films with little information given as to the plot of the movie, if there is one. Would you still recommend this movie for me to watch? Knowing that I hate seeing the blood and guts? Please let me know so that I can act accordingly. Thank you.
ReplyDeleteWell, knowing full well that you hate seeing blood and guts I would recommend this movie to you. In my opinion, there's more blood and guts in a Quentin Tarantino movie. And the body count isn't high until the last 20 minutes. And don't worry- there's still not a lot of blood and guts (it's more of a monumental spectacle). And I promise, yes, the movie has a plot. The movie runs about 90 minutes. The first half is average but the second half is icing on the cake. I bet you'll laugh every 20 minutes or so too ;-)
DeleteThis photo is as bad as it gets ----> http://img2-2.timeinc.net/ew/i/2012/04/11/cabin-in-the-woods_320.jpg
DeleteThey don't show any weird torture. It's not on the level of a movie like Hostel or House of 1,000 corpses
I am not typically a fan of the horror genre, but I think that it would be fun to film that genre of movie. One, I do special effects makeup and could gross people out (as long as I do it-I'm not grossed out). Secondly, I'd love to act in this type, but couldn't pull off the whore or athlete- though the scholar, fool, or virgin could be fair game.
ReplyDelete